Mercer actuary David Knox says the data used to determine the old age dependency ratio is “totally out of date” and overstates the severity of the problem.
From their inception, SMSFs have always attracted more than their fair share of criticism. Now it’s an ageing membership that’s being used to restrict their numbers.
Why I don’t own Telstra & Platinum (PTM) shares
On the ASX, shares of Platinum Asset Management Ltd (ASX: PTM) and Telstra Corporation Ltd (ASX: TLS) are a popular dividend ‘stalwart’ that every income-focused investor knows and follows.
Telstra is the oldest telecommunications business in Australia, having built the first telegraph line in 1854. In 2019, it provides more than 17 million retail mobile services, around 5 million retail fixed voice services (e.g. home phones) and 3.6 million broadband services.
Platinum Asset Management was founded in 1994 and one of the co-founders was leading investor Kerr Neilson. As of 2020, Platinum is a fund manager that aims to provide investors exposure to international shares using a contrarian, long-term and bottom-up investment process. Platinum’s International Fund has been running since April 1995.
While the 10-year share price performance of Platinum and Telstra looks disappointing (and it is), the benefits of consistent dividends with franking credits should not be underestimated. Depending on the study you read and the market in question, some experts estimate as much as half of the stockmarket’s total return (as a whole) comes just from the dividends paid by companies.
Over the past 10 years, Telstra has paid $2.73 in dividends (100% franked) while Platinum shareholders received $2.92 (also 100% franked).
Aside from paying big dividends over the years, there are a few more similarities between Platinum and Telstra, and in my mind, the most obvious is this: both companies were the most dominant businesses in their fields for many years, but their leadership is now under pressure.
Telstra – gravy train to transition pain
Being gifted 100-year-old copper cabling throughout the country gave Telstra’s management team the right to print money.
Every telecommunications company from Derby to Darwin, Cape York to Coober Pedy had to base its business model on access to Telstra’s pits and backbone network. But let’s be real: the copper cabling was 100 years old, so let’s keep that in mind.
When the NBN Co agreed to buy Telstra’s network of pits – Surprise! That’s asbestos! – the tables had already begun to turn on Telstra’s dominance in fixed products like home phones and internet.
The prospect of selling its copper network to NBN Co made heaps of sense at the time because it guaranteed an annuity of cash flow to Telstra at a time when its fixed broadband and fixed voice products were getting sandwiched by more modern communication mediums like 4G and 5G mobile. Telstra’s gravy train was already running dry…
For the past five years and over the next five years, Telstra has and will be forced to transition its business by investing heavily into mobile networks, which don’t come cheap. This will come at a time when it has lots of ‘legacy debt’ – debt backed by the money printing machine which was its network access rights.
In mobile, Telstra is facing off with stiff opponents, with the TPG Telecom Ltd (ASX: TPM) and Hutchison Telecommunications (ASX: HTA) alliance, and SingTel’s Optus also recognising the potential.
All things considered, I doubt Telstra will be the dividend darling it once was anytime soon. While I still like the business, I’m not willing to invest my capital into a business with so much debt when it’s going through a transition like this. In my opinion, there are better alternatives for dividends.
(Irony: today, my home finally got connected to the NBN. This is the first-ever article I’ve published over a fibre-to-the-node NBN connection… let’s see if the message reaches you).
Platinum – still relevant
Back in the 90s and early 2000s funds management was unbelievably lucrative. It was a party.
Much like retail franchises of the 80s and 90s, shrewd and intelligent finance people realised the best way to get rich was – and still is – to use other people’s money to do it. Take their money in, invest it, charge 1-2% and (if you do what you were supposed to) get a fat clip in performance fees.
Today, funds management is still bucket loads of ‘fun’ and many great investors are fruitfully rewarded for their talents. I personally know many great Australian fund managers who deserve to be paid well.
However, funds management is now much more competitive than it was. The confluence of more fee-conscious consumers/clients and the velocity of information means fund managers are punished for moments of underperformance, even if they’re only temporary.
Platinum, which is a powerhouse in global funds management, is still very relevant today. But a few years of poorer performance has been paired with the rise of Magellan Funds Management (ASX: MFG) and the likes of Pinnacle-backed Antipodes Partners – amongst many others.
What I mean to say is, to some extent, many investors see their fund managers as fungible and jump from one to another faster than ever. For example, swapping global fund manager #1 into a portfolio in place of global fund manager #2 is arguably too easy these days. In May 2020, Platinum experienced a net outflow of client money to the tune of $211 million. That’s a small amount of money relative to its $21.7 billion under management – but it’s noticeable.
The bottom line is I think Platinum has a great business model and a talented team, but the money it makes is heavily dependent on good investment performance and, increasingly, a very strong sales focus. If I were looking for growth in a financial company for my share portfolio, I’d want to own something that is more ‘sticky’ and keeps its customers locked in – this is why I love financial technology and software companies.
Next steps
In a diversified portfolio, I understand why so many investors see value in holding companies like Telstra or Platinum.
That said, my default setting for most investors is as follows:
- If you’re looking for dividends or consistent, compare the merits of your favourite dividend share with a diversified dividend ETF or a vanilla index fund. You’ll likely get your franking credits – and the dividend income isn’t reliant on just one company’s performance.
- If you want long-term growth in individual companies over the long run, and you can handle more volatility – something which I’ve found is mandatory for high-growth investing – keep your focus fixed solely on the best companies you can find.
There are over 200 ETFs, hundreds of managed funds and 2,000 individual companies in Australia, plus 10,000 more overseas – you can afford to be very choosey.
Information warning: this article is published by The Rask Group Pty Ltd and contains general financial advice only. It should not be relied upon as a substitute for personal financial advice because it does NOT take into account your needs, goals or objectives. Always consult a licensed financial adviser before acting on this information and consider the Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) of any ETF before buying or selling.
