Home / News / Active wins a round against passive funds

Active wins a round against passive funds

News

The active vs. passive debate has been raging for close to a decade now. From a macro level it is abundantly clear that passive has one. The sheer flow of assets moving into passive strategies has of itself driven this outperformance.

  • For those new to investing, passive investing is better known as index-tracking, in which the investor receives the ‘market’ return. Examples are buying funds or ETFs that mirror the S&P/ASX200, or the S&P500. In return for your investment in the fund you will own a portfolio that broadly equates to the makeup of said index, holding all 200 or 500 stocks.

    Outside of the delivering the ‘market’ or average return, the approach gained real popularity due to the ability to reduce the cost of investing. It has become increasingly popular with millennials and pension funds alike, many of whom gain their core exposure in this manner and then complement it with more actively managed strategies.

    Yet the approach continues to have its detractors; of which I am one. At least, a detractor of relying solely on a single index to deliver performance. There are multiple reasons, one many suggest is that it represents the ‘socialisation’ of investing where companies receive more capital based on their size rather than their merit.

    The others include the concentration risk, or lack of diversification offered by many indices these days. Consider, for instance, that 50 per cent of the S&P/ASX200 index is made up of just two sectors, financials and mining companies. Others suggests that incredible growth in the sector is seeing too much power attributed to just a few companies like BlackRock and Vanguard; or alternatively, it is starving other high-quality companies of capital.

    Regardless, it is clear that passive investing is here to stay, and we must deal with the implications that has for investments and volatility. This month S&P Dow Jones released its annual Scorecard report on the performance of Australia’s active funds versus their own benchmarks.

    The report assesses the domestic universe of Australian equity, global equity, smaller companies and bond funds against the ‘passive index’, which this year delivered some unexpected results.

    For the first time in years, more than half of the 936 Australian equity funds actually outperformed the S&P/ASX200 index. The results were 30.1 per cent versus 27.8 percent for the financial year, with over 55 per cent outperforming. That said, S&P is quick to point out that just 25 and 20 per cent of these funds outperformed over the last five and ten years respectively.

    Was there something specific about 2021 that contributed to this? On first blush, having watched the market closely over the last 12 months, what has been abundantly clear is the incredible performance of smaller companies, both good and bad. This was likely a key contributor to the performance of active funds that were able to adjust their exposures away from the struggling banking and industrials sectors throughout the year.  

    This was further evidenced by the fact that 65 per cent of Australian small and mid-cap funds beat the index, gaining 39.9 percent on average vs. the index of 34.5 per cent. Similar to large cap, this falls to 35 per cent over longer time periods; yet it is clear that small companies offer greater scope for outperformance.

    What was likely most surprising to many was the poor performance of international equity strategies, with 54 per cent of the 500-fund universe failing to beat the benchmark.

    As is always the case, though, this analysis should be taken with a grain of salt. While it is able to adjust for survivorship bias, it is not able to adjust for those funds in any universe that are considered ‘investable’. For instance, the likes of Morningstar, Lonsec and other research firms would suggest as few as 100 of the funds assessed would actually be ‘investable’ for most people based on size, profitability and quality.

    The saying “past performance is no guarantee of future performance” is posted in every piece of data about investments, yet it continues to dominate the psyche of most investors, part of which may explain the popularity of passive investing following a decade-long bull market.

    Personally, I see a role for both passive and active investing within portfolios, with the former able to provide a low-cost core to be complemented by highly skilled managers with a proven ability to outperform. Similarly, given the unique risks associated with most indices, as I referenced above, a pure index approach is likely better suited to those with an extremely long-time horizon, who are able to deal with and look beyond current valuation levels.

    As we saw in 2020, the volatility of the index can be extremely high; and you are guaranteed to get the market return whether that is negative forty per cent or positive ten percent.




    Print Article

    Related
    Why bank analysts prefer this quality lender over the rest

    Morgans have released a summary of the key points from the recent bank reporting season. Of the banks that reported, Morgans says NAB was in line with consensus expectations, while ANZ and WBC beat consensus earnings expectations. Despite this, Morgans holds NAB as having the strongest 1H22 performance overall. NAB produced the strongest profit growth…

    Ishan Dan | 18th May 2022 | More
    Two of the most bullish bets on the ASX

    Markets around the world are still in freefall as losses mount as a result of investors moving out of risk partly due to inflation fears and supply chain disruptions partly due to the crisis in Ukraine and Covid lockdowns in China. The market is yet to become comfortable with the rate hike cycle that is…

    Ishan Dan | 18th May 2022 | More
    Top of the pops – top global funds had one thing in common

    March stands out as being one of the most difficult periods for investors in a generation. On the one hand, bond markets send fixed income to its worst return in more decades, and on the other, equity markets were sold off broadly on valuation concerns as bond yields ended a forty-year downward trend. It is…

    Drew Meredith | 18th May 2022 | More
    Popular
    1
    What does High Conviction mean?
    Ishan Dan | 10th Mar 2021 | More
    2
    Inside CSL’s big end of year deal
    Lachlan Buur-Jensen | 15th Dec 2021 | More
    3
    Battery materials in short supply but valuation is key
    Ishan Dan | 25th Mar 2022 | More
    4
    Behind Brickworks’ (ASX:BKW) record profit
    Jaz Harrison | 25th Mar 2022 | More
    5
    Is JB Hi-Fi the best retailer in Australia?
    Lachlan Buur-Jensen | 25th Mar 2022 | More
    6
    Three ASX stocks ripe for a takeover
    Lachlan Buur-Jensen | 23rd Mar 2022 | More